Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] A case for the language lawyers
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 15:16:59
Joel Falcou wrote:
> Eric Niebler a écrit :
>> Hmm, comeau online rejects this code, too. (Not too surprising, I
>> think Intel uses the comeau front end.) It's possible this is a gcc
>> bug, not an Intel bug. When I have some time, I'll dive into the
>> standard and see what it says about this case.
> I'll d/l ICC 11 as soon as possible and see how it fares.
> Even if it's a gcc bug, can't we enforce the Dummy technique as *the*
> way to define proto extension ?
Well, the Dummy parameter is usually not needed, but you're right in
that it never hurts to put it in. I'll make sure the documentation
covers this case.
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing www.boostpro.com
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net