Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] A case for the language lawyers
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 15:16:59

Joel Falcou wrote:
> Eric Niebler a écrit :
>> Hmm, comeau online rejects this code, too. (Not too surprising, I
>> think Intel uses the comeau front end.) It's possible this is a gcc
>> bug, not an Intel bug. When I have some time, I'll dive into the
>> standard and see what it says about this case.
> I'll d/l ICC 11 as soon as possible and see how it fares.
> Even if it's a gcc bug, can't we enforce the Dummy technique as *the*
> way to define proto extension ?

Well, the Dummy parameter is usually not needed, but you're right in
that it never hurts to put it in. I'll make sure the documentation
covers this case.

Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at