Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [dataflow][iostreams]Can someone Compare/Contrast
From: Duane McKinney (duane.mckinney_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-25 12:45:03
Duane McKinney wrote:
> If it has already been done I appologize. They seem very similar to me.
> Is it just a matter of style? It seems like dataflow lends itself
> better to dealing with blocks/frames of data than the iostreams library.
> I would appreciate any clarification though.
I believe I may have answered my own question, correct me if I am wrong.
It seems to me that the main difference between boost::iostreams and
boost::dataflow is the unit of work on which they operate.
boost::iostreams performs processing on a continuous stream of information
boost::dataflow performs its processing in function blocks, where the
output of one function is passed to the input of the next.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net