Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Meaning of or_<> with empty arguments
From: Mickael Wolff (mickael_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-14 02:35:21

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Regex] problems compiling with gcc 4.4"
Previous message: Mickael Wolff: "Re: [Boost-users] [Regex] problems compiling with gcc 4.4"
In reply to: Reetesh Mukul: "[Boost-users] Meaning of or_<> with empty arguments"
Next in thread: Reetesh Mukul: "Re: [Boost-users] Meaning of or_<> with empty arguments"
Reply: Reetesh Mukul: "Re: [Boost-users] Meaning of or_<> with empty arguments"

Reetesh Mukul a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> This code compiles:-

If you don't have, get a book about C++ ;) . Templates can have
default parameters like functions :

template<typename LEFT = bool, typename RIGHT = bool>
compare(LEFT, RIGHT) ;

-- 
Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis
Racine <http://lupusmic.org>
Blog   <http://blog.lupusmic.org>

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [Boost-users] [Regex] problems compiling with gcc 4.4"
Previous message: Mickael Wolff: "Re: [Boost-users] [Regex] problems compiling with gcc 4.4"
In reply to: Reetesh Mukul: "[Boost-users] Meaning of or_<> with empty arguments"
Next in thread: Reetesh Mukul: "Re: [Boost-users] Meaning of or_<> with empty arguments"
Reply: Reetesh Mukul: "Re: [Boost-users] Meaning of or_<> with empty arguments"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net