Re: [Boost-users] Do "entire range" standard algorithms already exist

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Do "entire range" standard algorithms already exist
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-31 13:32:52

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 00:19, Kirk Korver <kkorver_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I recently found the boost::range library. It seems very useful.
>
> An annoyance that I have with STL algorithms is that they are very verbose.
> Most of the time I need to do something over the entire range. I'm sure I'm
> not alone here.
>

It looks like RangeEx (a proposed replacement for boost.range) includes that:
http://www.nabble.com/-RangeEx--Range---RangeEx-td19454585.html