|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] scoped_ptr::release (again)
From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-20 21:54:33
On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
> From http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_36_0/libs/smart_ptr/scoped_ptr.htm
> :
>
> "If scoped_ptr had a release() member, it would become possible to
> transfer ownership of the held pointer, weakening its role as a way
> of limiting resource lifetime to a given context. Use std::auto_ptr
> where transfer of ownership is required. (supplied by Dave Abrahams)"
>
> But there already is a way to escape the scope, via swap().
>
> Would it make more sense to just provide release() and have users
> specify const if they want? (const scoped_ptr/scoped_array would
> effectively disallow swapping/releasing.)
<opinion>
http://home.roadrunner.com/~hinnant/unique_ptr03.html
(search for "scoped_ptr")
</opinion>
-Howard
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net