Re: [Boost-users] [TR1] How to say BOOST_USE_BOOST_TR1

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [TR1] How to say BOOST_USE_BOOST_TR1
From: Markus Werle (numerical.simulation_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-26 07:14:24

John Maddock <john <at> johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:

> 
> > Or are we going to run into trouble because another std header might
> > include the compiler's tr1 stuff again?
> 
> Yes, for example there are TR1 components in existing C++ std lib headers 
> such as <utility> <cmath> etc.
> 
> So there's no mechanism by which we can avoid including the vendors version 
> if it's available.

[Still not giving up]
What we need then is the possiblity to use the
boost tr1 components from namespace boost::tr1, e.g.
boost::tr1::tuple<...> // behaves like std::tr1::truple.
vs.
boost::tuple<...> // does not behave like std::tr1::tuple

Is this feasible?

Markus