Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx
From: Alan M. Carroll (amc_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-03 11:06:47

I agree with this as well.

At 04:23 PM 3/2/2009, you wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Thorsten Ottosen <> wrote:
- What is your evaluation of the design?

The 'ed naming is not good, and for consistency across Boost the _view
naming should be used.

However, in my mind map each of the adaptors is a verb rather than a noun, so
the expression should read as

rng | sort | unique

rather than

rng | sort_view | unique_view

Whereas when the function invocation syntax is used the _view naming seems to
express the intent more clearly. ie

unique_view( sort_view( rng ) )

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at