Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] pointer to member function of multi_index
From: Sandeep Gupta (gupta.sandeep_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-18 14:53:08
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Sandeep Gupta wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
>>> However, it is not usually a good idea to rely on the exact
>>> signature of library member functions. For instance, the standard
>>> library allows member functions to have extra default arguments.
>>> In the case of multi_index, using a reference to const will not
>>> always work because multi_index uses call_traits
>> I see. So I take it that its best to avoid creating function objects
>> or pointer to standard library member functions.
> It's okay to create a function objects like those in phoenix
> as long as you don't bind a member pointer in the process.
Would trouble you for one more clarification regarding this issue.
How do we go about binding overloaded member functions without
specifying exact signature. From what I could gather to adapt
overloaded functions we need the full signature.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net