Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Q] scoped_ptr for forward declared classes
From: V S P (toreason_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-31 14:04:48
thank you very much,
I do have quite a few static variables.
I will try this if does not work, I will create an example
of the problem and post it here.
I actually started using
//my heap allocation code goes here
and I am seeing much fewer, so I think it coincides with your suggestion
about static initializations.
I was just looking for 'look here or try there' type of suggestion
which you provided.
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:33 +0300, "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> V S P:
> > and still trying to debug why shared_ptr reports mem leaks with Visual
> > Studio.
> In general, for us to be able to help, you have to post a complete
> that reports a leak. Your previous example was not just heavily
> and used the wrong class names, it also didn't have any uses of
> at all (although it did have a thread_specific_ptr.)
> False leak reports are typically caused by static variables whose
> destructors haven't yet run when the leak report is generated. Try
> .reset() on all static shared_ptr variables before exit and see if the
> Boost-users mailing list
-- V S P toreason_at_[hidden] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net