Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-08 07:56:40

Hicham Mouline a écrit :
> So I am concerned about
>         process(xbegin, xend, x, const S& s)   // then access s.d1 and s.d2
> as I measured it is slower than 
>        process(xbegin, xend, x, double d1, double d2)
>   
How did you performed your benchmark ? Most modern compiler should 
produce similar code for those two interface. Are you sure you pass your 
structure by reference ? How large is your sample measures ?

-- 
___________________________________________
Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor
PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI
Tel : [phone]