Re: [Boost-users] [test] Ignoring SIGCHLD for signal codes other than CLD_EXITED

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [test] Ignoring SIGCHLD for signal codes other than CLD_EXITED
From: Boris Schaeling (boris_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-08 09:12:44

On Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:26:05 +0200, Gevorg Voskanyan <v_gevorg_at_[hidden]>  
wrote:

>
> I could not find a response to the following message:
> http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2008/09/40618.php
> , which proposes to modify  ignore_sigchild() implementation to account  
> for a proposed BOOST_TEST_IGNORE_SIGCHLD preprocessor switch.
> I am seconding this request. Has it ever been considered? Or was it the  
> message simply went unnoticed?

Gevorg,

I didn't test Boost.Process yet with Boost 1.38.0. As Boost.Test is not  
mentioned on http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_38_0 I guess there  
hasn't been any change though. But I also still think Boost.Test should be  
adapted here (as I didn't have time lately to continue developing  
Boost.Process it wasn't an urgent issue for me though).

Boris