Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-08 14:24:51

Next message: Jeremy Rottman: "Re: [Boost-users] Determining thread existence"
Previous message: Frank Mori Hess: "Re: [Boost-users] boost coroutine status"
In reply to: Hicham Mouline: "Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments"
Next in thread: Hicham Mouline: "Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments"
Reply: Hicham Mouline: "Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments"

Hicham Mouline a écrit :
> Thanks. I moved the 1st typename out of enable_if in a separate metatfct
> (kind of binder1st for mpl)
>
> It still fails the compile error is here:
>
> http://codepad.org/gR04D5T5
>
> regards,
>
You may want to use enable_if on the return type instead of the argument
type.

-- 
___________________________________________
Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor
PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI
Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35

Next message: Jeremy Rottman: "Re: [Boost-users] Determining thread existence"
Previous message: Frank Mori Hess: "Re: [Boost-users] boost coroutine status"
In reply to: Hicham Mouline: "Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments"
Next in thread: Hicham Mouline: "Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments"
Reply: Hicham Mouline: "Re: [Boost-users] different member function signatures based on class template arguments"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net