Re: [Boost-users] boost coroutine status

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost coroutine status
From: Nat Goodspeed (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-08 14:39:42

Frank Mori Hess wrote:

> I don't do much windows development, but I don't think a coroutine header file 
> is supposed to redefine _WIN32_WINNT.  Spitting out an error message saying 
> it requires _WIN32_WINNT >= 0x400 seems more appropriate.

I don't know the mapping of that value to a Windows version. A colleague 
informs me that visibility of the relevant declarations was also an 
issue when he worked with the Fiber API six years ago; his team actually 
copied those declarations from winbase.h into an internal header file.

The only other data point I have is the 'coco' library source [1], from 
which I borrowed that #define.

[1] http://www.mr-edd.co.uk/?page_id=91