Re: [Boost-users] General C++: Class Method Signatures Miss-Match

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] General C++: Class Method Signatures Miss-Match
From: Dominique Devienne (ddevienne_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-01 18:43:36

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Dan Day <coolmandan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Wouldn't then the OP rather use uint32_t or similar?

AFAIK this type doesn't exist on all platforms portably.

> I thought that
> int represented the natural word size of the architecture. If so, then
> wouldn't unsigned int be 64-bit on a 64-bit platform as well?

The few 64-bit platforms I've seen keep [unsigned] int at 32-bits. --DD