Boost Users :
Subject: [Boost-users] [rerepost][threads] recursive shared_mutex
Date: 2009-05-05 09:51:38
I promise this is the last time I repost this; if I got no response I'll go
and try somewhere else :-/ thanks for your patience.
As the docs do not explicitly say otherwise, I guess I must assume that
boost::shared_mutex is not recursive with respect to unique ownership,
that is, the following behavior ensues:
lock_guard<shared_mutex> lock2(mutex); // DEADLOCK
Is this so? In case boost::shared_mutex is indeed non-recursive, I've
read the following assertion on Hinnant's paper N2406
"A recursive shared mutex could be built upon shared_mutex if desired,
but this is not proposed."
Does anyone has a reference on how to construct a recursive
shared_mutex from a non-recursive one?
Joaquín M López Muñoz
Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net