Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Test] BOOST_FAIL vs BOOST_ERROR
From: Greg Christopher (gchristopher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-14 13:40:40
Hi and thanks,
> > This is true- we can use warn to mean aborting test although
> > it seems to go against what most "first readers"
> > of the code would think it is.
> warning by itself does not cause test case to abort.
That is clear- again my concern is with the workflow that is triggered after execution is complete and people are reading the test reports. A warn coupled with a logging message that says test was aborted should be clear enough.
BOOST_REQUIRE won't work in the setup step because it does exactly what I want to avoid :) Thanks, I will throw a c++ exception.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net