Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [accumulators] density: empty values
From: Kim Kuen Tang (kuentang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-16 08:48:11
Robert Kubrick schrieb:
> I changed the number of samples to 10, matching the original cache_size
> parameter. It works better:
first the behaviour of the density feature is not a bug. If you set the
cache_size=10, then the first 10 samples will be used to determine the
bin lower bound. That is, it first extracts the min and max from the
first 10 samples, after that it creates the bin_positions according to
bin_positions[i]=minimum + (i - 1.) * (maximum - minimum)/num_bins.
After this procedure the calculation of the statistics begins. That's
why the bin values and indexes are not initialized when sample size is
smaller then the cache_size.
> A couple of questions:
> 1) I have a real-time application that keeps track of some statistics
> based on the events received so the values can not be
> pre-determined. Statistics are reset by the application at regular
> time intervals. What happens if I leave the cache_size parameter to
Leaving the cache_size to one doesnt make sense, because min=max and
bin_positions will all be the same.
I suggest you to leave cache_size to two and create two artificial
values acc(min=your choice) and acc(max=your choice).
This wont have any statistical impact, if your sample size is large>100
> and then keep adding samples? Is there a serious performance
No there is no serious performance penalty.
> 2) Is there a way to reset the acc object in the example?
What do you mean by that? Do you want to set the statistics to zero?
Then you need definitely to deallocate the object and instantiate a new one.
> Or do I
> have to deallocate the object and instantiate a new one to
> generate a new sampling
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net