Re: [Boost-users] Integral type with no upper limit?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Integral type with no upper limit?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 11:10:20

> If the boost library did decide to implement and add its own limitless
> integer type, Couldn't this be added to part of the Boost.Math library?

It would certainly be nice if it interoperated well with Boost.Math, but 
it's a big enough library in it's right, to need it's own maintainer and 
"library in it's own right" status.

That said, it might be easier for new users to find if it was under a 
general "Math" or "Numeric" banner.

John.