Re: [Boost-users] Integral type with no upper limit?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Integral type with no upper limit?
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-28 12:31:29

2009/5/27 francesco biscani <bluescarni_at_[hidden]>:
>
> - header-only library: if used with small operands, GMP can suffer some
> performance penalty related to function call overhead. Maybe it would be
> possible to minimize it using aggressive inlining?
>

The big danger there is that the FSF's interpretation is that inlining
is more than linking (since they only really allow shared libraries),
and as such your project would have to be LGPL.