|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Am I doing something wrong here? Boost threads & intrusive_ptr crash
From: Space Ship Traveller (space.ship.traveller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-11 11:18:33
On 12/06/2009, at 2:37 AM, Nigel Rantor wrote:
> Space Ship Traveller wrote:
>> Hi,
> [snip]
>> Here is the function which is used to post a notification. REF(t) is
>> simply a macro for boost::intrusive_ptr<t>.
>
> Can you confirm which of the following REF(INotificationSource) maps
> to?
>
> boost::intrusive_ptr<INotificationSource> note
This one.
>
> or
>
> boost::intrusive_ptr<INotificationSource>& note
>
Sometimes I use this form, but not in this case.
> More concretely, is the parameter:
>
> 1 - a reference to an already existing intrusive_ptr
>
> 2 - a new intrusive_ptr using a copy constructor
>
> 3 - a new intrusive_ptr accepting a raw pointer
>
> If it is the third one then there is nothing to stop some particular
> interleaving of instructions decrementing the ref count to zero
> between
> your check and the construction of the parameter.
>
> Whether or not this causes an obvious error when you attempt to
> create a
> new intrusive_ptr from it will depend a lot of things.
>
> For example, I have a test I just made and I can get this to fail hard
> and to simply create a new intrusive_ptr from an invalid pointer,
> depending on what I do....
I appreciate your insight into the situation. I'm currently reviewing
the code, but there is definitely some bug like this.
I think it is a case of an increment and decrement interleaving in
such a way that the increment never occurs, and thus the object is
freed even thought there is still a reference to it.
Kind regards,
Samuel
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net