|
|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Signals] Another performance discussion
From: Igor R (boost.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-23 08:03:51
> Which gives me the results ~5.2 ms for the vector variant and ~411 ms for
> the boost::signals variant. However, disabling checked iterators gives me
> ~3.8 ms for the vector variant and ~180 ms for boost::signals, so it seems
> to make a world of difference for the overhead associated with slots.
Did you switch optimizations on?
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net