Re: [Boost-users] [format] Alternative syntax

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [format] Alternative syntax
From: Emre Turkay (emreturkay2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-07-30 03:05:56

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 06:16:19PM -0600, OvermindDL1 wrote:
> I like that syntax, and I can see how it could be better in that it
> would have better caching (does not need to recreate the object, which
> is very slow), and it is a more simple syntax then the normal way you
> can cache it.  Looks nice to me.

Well, thanks. Apparently, removing the extra copy of the boost::format
object does not change the functionality, so it is removed.

Take care,

     emre