Re: [Boost-users] [unit_test_framework] checkpoints for BOOST_CHECK*?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [unit_test_framework] checkpoints for BOOST_CHECK*?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-28 10:52:59

AMDG

rozelak_at_[hidden] wrote:
>> rozelak_at_[hidden] wrote:
>>     
>>> Is there a way how to achieve what I am looking for?
>>>       
>> Use BOOST_TEST_MESSAGE and set log level to message
>>     
>
> Yes, I have read about this option and it works - thank you. I consider
> it as not perfect, but working solution.
>
> However, I want to ask, if the idea of checkpoints could be generalised
> and used during check failure printing as well (as has been suggested
> in the example in my first post).
> I don't know boost source in depth, but it seems that BOOST_TEST_CHECKPOINT
> just calls boost::unit_test::unit_test_log.set_checkpoint(...), which
> stores the checkpoint info in unit_test_log (which is supposed to be
> singleton).
> Would, therefore, be possible to print the checkpoint stored also when
> test failure is printed? May I be helpfull somehow to do this?
>
> Or is it against the idea of the checkpoints?
>   

I think the issue is that BOOST_CHECK and friends set a checkpoint.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe