Re: [Boost-users] Building Boost on Snow Leopard (with Xcode 3.2 installed)

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building Boost on Snow Leopard (with Xcode 3.2 installed)
From: Hassan Syed (h.a.syed_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-03 07:40:48

On a side::note could you tell us what the autocomplete for boost is like
under xcode (once you solve the problem :D ) for boost once you have it
working.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Vladimir Prus <vladimir_at_[hidden]>wrote:

> Christopher Jefferson wrote:
>
> >
> > On 2 Sep 2009, at 23:18, James C. Sutherland wrote:
> >
> >> This probably won't help you, but there has been noise on two other
> >> mailing lists I monitor (CMake being one) that suggest people are
> >> having similar problems.  It seems that Snow Leopard (and the new
> >> GCC compiler bundled with it) defaults to 64 bit treatment or
> >> something.
> >
> > That is exactly true. If you want to force 32-bit executables, you can
> > give the -m32 flag (similarly, there is a -m64 flag for 64-bit).
> >
> > However, you can't just special-case snow leopard, because there is a
> > number of 32-bit intel macs, on which you can install snow leopard,
> > which themselves will default to 32-bit executables!
> >
> > The only (sane) method I've found to solve this is to do one of two
> > things.
> >
> > 1) Just use the system setting.
> > 2) Explicitly specify -m32 and -m64 on all systems.
>
> Just to clarify, what is the reason of the original error, quoted below?
>
> >>>> /usr/include/time.h:77: error: expected constructor, destructor,
> >>>> or type conversion before ‘typedef’
> >>>> /usr/include/time.h:124: error: ‘clock_t’ does not name a type
> >>>> In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/cwchar:52,
> >>>>               from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/bits/postypes.h:46,
> >>>>               from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/iosfwd:49,
> >>>>               from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/bits/stl_algobase.h:70,
> >>>>               from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/bits/char_traits.h:46,
> >>>>               from /usr/include/c++/4.2.1/string:47,
> >>>>               from ./boost/program_options/errors.hpp:12,
> >>>>               from ./boost/program_options/options_description.hpp:
> >>>> 12,
> >>>>               from libs/program_options/src/
> >>>> options_description.cpp:10:
>
> Is  32_64 fat compilation just broken?
>
> - Volodya
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>