Re: [Boost-users] Boost-users Digest, Vol 2115, Issue 4

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost-users Digest, Vol 2115, Issue 4
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-15 06:44:40

Dan Smithers wrote:

>> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:06:17 +0400
>> From: Vladimir Prus <vladimir_at_[hidden]>
>> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] building boost 1_33_1
>> Message-ID: <h8dshm$bce$2_at_[hidden]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> 
>> Dan Smithers wrote:
>> 
>>> I need to recompile boost 1_33_1 with the intel compiler icc 9.0
>>>
>>> The jamfiles are trying to use 8 in /opt (which doesn't actually exist).
>>>
>>> Please can someone point me in the right direction to do this.
> Thanks for the reply.
> 
> I have done some more things, and decided to try the same with boost
> 1.37 - the next version that I have been using.
> 
>>>
>>> I am using
>>>
>>> ./configure CXX=icc --prefix=/vol/build --with-toolset=intel-linux
>>> --with-bjam=/vol/build/boost-jam-3.1.17/bin.linuxx86/bjam
>> 
>> 1.33.1 is very old; and worse, it was using older version of Boost.Build.
>> Therefore, I'd recommend just hacking your way around in tools/build/v2/
>> intel-tools.jam, or however the file is called.
> 
> My problem now seems to be in the actual compilation: It tries to build
> in workarounds for gcc 2.95 and complains with about wrongly named
> header files.

If this results in compilation errors, you should see the compile command after
the errors.

> 
> Possibly the problem is because I don't understand enough Jam to work
> out what commands are actually being run.

Also, the "-d+2" option will print all commands that are run, not just those
that failed.

- Volodya