Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [unit_test_framework] checkpoints for BOOST_CHECK*?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-26 19:35:31


rozelak_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Bu may I have a question as well? Why do you refuse the extension
> of BOOST_WARN|CHECK|REQUIRE_* macro by user-defined massage? It
> seems to me as a natural extension of the macros (it is already
> possible with BOOST_CHECK_MESSAGE), while it by no means affects
> the existing interface. Is it so difficult to implement it? Is
> there a general resistance against interface extension?

There are tons of these. Presenting yet another set of 30 or so macros
with very limited advantage does not seem warranted to me.

Gennadiy


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net