|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Sockets and structures?
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-09-26 22:50:50
Daniel F. Savarese writes:
> To the OP, I would advise you not take statements such as the above as
> gospel without performing measurements yourself. My experience[1] is
> directly contrary to the above. I find boost::serialization execution
> time to be negligible (for binary archives) and entirely suitable for high
> performance networking applications even if that was not the creator's
> original objective (a credit to Robert Ramey's skill).
With respect for the library and Ramey, I'd like to point out
Additionally, the C++ Middleware Writer automates the
Regards,
"Then Samuel took a rock and set it up between
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net
that results obtained with the Boost Serialization library are
frequently less efficient than those from the C++ Middleware
Writer -- http://webEbenezer.net/comparison.html
.
job of writing serialization functions for structs/classes
unless it is directed not to do so.
Brian Wood
Ebenezer Enterprises
www.webEbenezer.net
Mizpah and Shen. He named it Ebenezer [Rock of
Help] and said, 'Until now the L-RD has helped us.'"