Re: [Boost-users] [python] Alternative to explicitly defining function pointers?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [python] Alternative to explicitly defining function pointers?
From: Ravi (lists_ravi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-12 21:06:23

On Monday 12 October 2009 04:07:26 Boris Schaeling wrote:
> Is it possible to simplify this code without defining a function pointer?

No, but please see recent discussions on cplusplus-sig for ideas for the 
future.
 
> -----
> struct X {
>    void y(std::string) { }
>    std::string y() { return ""; }
> };
> 
> std::string (X::*get_y)() = &X::y;
> 
> class_<X>("X").add_property("y", get_y);
> -----
> 

Regards,
Ravi