Re: [Boost-users] [OT] Interested in good (fast, robust)

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [OT] Interested in good (fast, robust)
From: Richard Ulrich (richi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-01 14:24:07

I'm using json_spirit from
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/recipes/JSON_Spirit.aspx
for parsing big but simple json files.
So far I didn't have any problems with it.
It's still based on classic spirit. Don't know if and when it will
switch to spirit 2.

Rgds
Richard

On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 12:00 -0500, boost-users-request_at_[hidden]
wrote:
> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:38:36 +0100
> From: Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl_at_[hidden]>
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [OT] Interested in good (fast, robust)
>         boost-based JSON API
> Message-ID: <4B15468C.7000309_at_[hidden]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Dominique Devienne wrote:
> > Can anyone recommend one such good targeted library up to Boost's
> > standards you've had good success with? (with a boost-like
> commercial
> > friendly license)
> >   
> Boost.PropertyTree has some support for parsing and writing JSON, but
> it 
> doesn't preserve types.
> 
> Sebastian