Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Mysterious failure of libboost_thread in 1_41_0
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-05 22:02:48

On Dec 6, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Stonewall Ballard wrote:

> The only difference between the Jamfile.v2 in each version is the removal of exceptions.cpp in 1_41_0. I don't understand the build system well enough to figure out what else might have changed. I'm building using:
> ./bjam address-model=32 architecture=x86 threading=multi

you could always run bjam with -n -a and diff the output in both cases. That will tell you how the build commands differ, if at all.

David Abrahams
BoostPro Computing

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at