Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [phoenix] Staus of phoenix
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-17 18:34:46
> > IIRC, Phoenix was reviewed and accepted on the condition that it be
> > reimplemented on top of Proto. That hasn't happened yet, and so
> Phoenix has
> > not been merged to trunk. The old version of Phoenix still exists as
> a part
> > Spirit.
> Hasn't this effort demonstrated that phoenix might not be as portable
> as the current implementation?
Why do you think Phoenix isn't 'portable'? Do you mean it doesn't compile on
outdated compilers? Or do you mean it doesn't compile using C++0x? What do
you mean by that? Please be more specific.
> Maybe isn't the current implementation good enough for Phoenix to be a
> first-class citizen?
I'm not sure where this comes from. If you followed the review or read the
review decision you wouldn't ask this question.
Meet me at BoostCon
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net