Re: [Boost-users] [phoenix] Staus of phoenix

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [phoenix] Staus of phoenix
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-17 18:34:46

> > IIRC, Phoenix was reviewed and accepted on the condition that it be
> > reimplemented on top of Proto. That hasn't happened yet, and so
> Phoenix has
> > not been merged to trunk. The old version of Phoenix still exists as
> a part
> > Spirit.
> 
> Hasn't this effort demonstrated that phoenix might not be as portable
> as the current implementation?

What effort? 

Why do you think Phoenix isn't 'portable'? Do you mean it doesn't compile on
outdated compilers? Or do you mean it doesn't compile using C++0x? What do
you mean by that? Please be more specific.

> Maybe isn't the current implementation good enough for Phoenix to be a
> first-class citizen?

I'm not sure where this comes from. If you followed the review or read the
review decision you wouldn't ask this question.

Regards Hartmut

---------------
Meet me at BoostCon
www.boostcon.com