Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [phoenix] Staus of phoenix
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-17 18:34:46

> > IIRC, Phoenix was reviewed and accepted on the condition that it be
> > reimplemented on top of Proto. That hasn't happened yet, and so
> Phoenix has
> > not been merged to trunk. The old version of Phoenix still exists as
> a part
> > Spirit.
> Hasn't this effort demonstrated that phoenix might not be as portable
> as the current implementation?

What effort?

Why do you think Phoenix isn't 'portable'? Do you mean it doesn't compile on
outdated compilers? Or do you mean it doesn't compile using C++0x? What do
you mean by that? Please be more specific.

> Maybe isn't the current implementation good enough for Phoenix to be a
> first-class citizen?

I'm not sure where this comes from. If you followed the review or read the
review decision you wouldn't ask this question.

Regards Hartmut

Meet me at BoostCon

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at