|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] undefined reference to `boost::thread_resource_error::thread_resource_error()'
From: Andrew Maclean (andrew.amaclean_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-19 02:36:06
I saw something like this in Linux too. The fix was to remove all the
old boost-1.40 libraries.
In fact I removed all the boost 1.40 and 1.41 libraries and header s
and reinstalled boost 1.40.
Andrew
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> AMDG
>
> Stefano wrote:
>>
>> On ubuntu, I have a piece of software linking against the boost thread
>> library. Linking with boost version 1.40 I don't have any problem, whereas
>> switching to 1.41 I got the
>>
>> undefined reference to
>> `boost::thread_resource_error::thread_resource_error()'
>>
>> In the sources I see that this constructor is now inlined and if I do
>>
>> nm -C -D libboost_thread.so | grep thread_resource_error
>>
>> from this (1.40)
>>
>> 0000ee80 T boost::thread_resource_error::thread_resource_error(int)
>> 0000ee00 T boost::thread_resource_error::thread_resource_error()
>> 0000ee40 T boost::thread_resource_error::thread_resource_error(int)
>> 0000edc0 T boost::thread_resource_error::thread_resource_error()
>> 0000f4c0 T boost::thread_resource_error::~thread_resource_error()
>> 0000f500 T boost::thread_resource_error::~thread_resource_error()
>> 0000f530 T boost::thread_resource_error::~thread_resource_error()
>> 0000eec0 T boost::thread_resource_error::what() const
>> 00013e00 V typeinfo for boost::thread_resource_error
>> 0000ffc0 V typeinfo name for boost::thread_resource_error
>> 00013d98 V vtable for boost::thread_resource_error
>>
>> I got this (1.41)
>>
>> 0000b6e0 W boost::thread_resource_error::~thread_resource_error()
>> 0000b720 W boost::thread_resource_error::~thread_resource_error()
>> 0000b480 W boost::thread_resource_error::what() const
>> 0001282c V typeinfo for boost::thread_resource_error
>> 0000ed00 V typeinfo name for boost::thread_resource_error
>> 00012848 V vtable for boost::thread_resource_error
>>
>> The symbol is weak now. I should be not a problem, right?
>
> No, the constructor is not there. What you see is the destructor.
>
>> But I got the unresolved ref
>>
>> What is the best option to have my stuff compiled without the unresolved
>> refs?
>
>
> Are you absolutely sure that you compiled with the 1.41 headers?
>
> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
-- ___________________________________________ Andrew J. P. Maclean Centre for Autonomous Systems The Rose Street Building J04 The University of Sydney 2006 NSW AUSTRALIA Ph: +61 2 9351 3283 Fax: +61 2 9351 7474 URL: http://www.acfr.usyd.edu.au/ ___________________________________________
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net