Re: [Boost-users] bjam? cmake?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] bjam? cmake?
From: Mathieu Malaterre (mathieu.malaterre_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-23 11:15:31

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Vladimir Prus
<vladimir_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> If it is, how far has the effort gotten?  I have a few tiny utilities
>> written in C++ currently built and installed with GNU make, which I'd
>> like to replace with something more portable, and I don't want to learn
>> bjam and bbv2 if their replacement is around the corner.
>
> You are safe in learning Boost.Build, it's not going away anytime soon.

There are growing number of projects using CMake. The most notable one
being KDE itself. So I would think, CMake is *really* not going away
anytime soon.
CMake has no other requirement than cmake itself (a stand alone executable).

2cts
-- 
Mathieu