Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Wave] Modifying the way function-like macros are interpreted
From: fractured_at_[hidden]
Date: 2009-12-25 12:31:51

As Wave is a preprocessor conforming to the C++ Standard this is not
> possible.
> But you can define your macro like
> #define x(y) llList2String(x,y)
> if that's an option.
> OTOH, Wave is open source, so you should be able to find the
> corresponding
> code to add your syntax. Do you want _all_ macros to be defined using
> the []
> syntax or is this something you want to have additionally to the 'normal'
> function style syntax?
As far as I can tell, x(y) treats it as a function named x with a
argument, not the x as a argument itself to do (y) on; in any case I
wanted it in addition to the normal behavior.

Also, LSL does not use [] except for defining lists, e.g. list ex =
[entry1,entry2,entr3];, or as a argument to a function, func([1,2,3],..
, but never in this particular manner, which would involve alphanumeric
characters from the var name directly preceding the [. I was just
wondering if there was something I could easily change to allow for this
through wave.

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at