Re: [Boost-users] [signals2] analysing the signature

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [signals2] analysing the signature
From: Igor R (boost.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-08 11:04:53

> first_argument_type/second_argument_type only exist for 2 argument signals.
> 1 argument signals just have argument_type. Â IIRC, thats how stuff in the functors in the STL look.

Oh, I see. Actually, I missinterpreted its description - I thought
that first_argument_type should exist if the signal has *at least* 1
argument.

Thanks again.