Re: [Boost-users] [Gil new_io] Some questions and remarks

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Gil new_io] Some questions and remarks
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-03 11:15:44

Hi Olivier, thanks for all of your time. I'll get you changes in asap!

> * pnm_read_test.cpp compiles fine if you add some instanciations in
> pnm_tags.hpp (patch attached).
> * jpeg_old_test.cpp is also compilable with slight changes. The compilation
> problem appears on line 237 in formats/jpeg/write.hpp:
>
>     return apply_operation_base< Types1
>                                , image_write_info< jpeg_tag >
>                                >( arg1.bits()
>                                 , arg1.index()
>                                 , info
>                                 , op
>                                 );
>
> arg1.bits() is then passed to return_apply_operation_base which takes a
> reference on its first argument. Since arg1.bits() is local, it is const and
> thus cannot be used as a reference (patch attached). Not sure my solution is
> the best one. Maybe better to change apply_operation_base to have as first
> argument a const reference ...
>
> I also attach a patch to fix paths in tiff_file_format_test.cpp.
>

Thanks!!

>> That would be great. My system of using MinGW is pretty limited. In
>> the past I had to do a lot of tweaking for gcc. It would be great to
>> have someone helping out. Not just for the gil::io but also for gil
>> overall.
>
> OK. Really interested to help. Let me know. You may contact me in private.
> May I have a write access to the svn repo?

I have added your gmail address to the project. And yes we should
probably go private since the new gil::io isn't a boost lib.

Best,
Christian