Re: [Boost-users] Possibly too newbie a question?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Possibly too newbie a question?
From: Eric Whitcombe (ericwsf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-19 14:44:12

I am using 1.42.0--
The declaration of rbtree_best_fit in rbtree_best_fit.hpp at line 58 looks 
like:

template<class MutexFamily, class VoidPointer, std::size_t MemAlignment>
class rbtree_best_fit

The VoidPointer parameter name is what is used throughout the class 
implementation.

The forward declarationy ou pointed out in interprocess_fwd.hpp at line 166 
looks like:

template<class MutexFamily, class VoidMutex = offset_ptr<void>, std::size_t 
MemAlignment = 0>
class rbtree_best_fit;

The VoidMutex there is weird.
The same thing occurs in 1.35.0 and 1.36.0 -- the only other version I 
happen to have.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Gevorg Voskanyan" <v_gevorg_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost-users_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Possibly too newbie a question?

> Eric Whitcombe wrote:
>> Thanks I just stumbled on that earlier today. It confounds me that the 
>> parameter
>> is renamed from VoidPointer to VoidMutex   ???!!!
> that is basically how
>> I missed it. I thought there was some inscurtable argument deduction 
>> going
>> on.
>
>
> Eric,
>
> Well, I don't see the parameter renaming you mentioned. In fact, the only 
> place I see "VoidPointer" identifier used in interprocess_fwd.hpp is on 
> line 394 in declaration of intrusive_ptr class template, which is 
> unrelated...
> This is from a very recent boost trunk.
>
> Best Regards,
> Gevorg
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users