Re: [Boost-users] [lamda] smart self binding of a function object

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [lamda] smart self binding of a function object
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-11 10:10:02

AMDG

alfC wrote:
> since I have access to f I would like to make f smart enough to handle
> its own binding. Eg.
>
> class f{
>   ... // same as before
>  function<double(double)> operator()(double x_value, YYYY y_arg){
>    return bind(
>          &f::operator(), //maybe needs cast to double(*)
> (double,double)
>          *this,
>          x_value,
>          y_arg
>    );
>  }
>  function<double(double)> operator()(XXXX x_arg, double y_value){
>    return bind(
>       &f::operator(), //maybe needs cast
>       *this,
>       x_arg,
>       y_value
>    );
>  }
> };
>
> The question is: What should be the type of XXXX and YYYY?
>   

You'll have to make operator() a template:

template<class T>
function<double(double)> operator()(const T& x_arg, double y_arg);

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe