|
|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Please help with rebuild on Windows
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-15 20:34:16
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John Dlugosz
<JDlugosz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Your email is nothing but blackness, if you are going to specify a
>> foreground color, then make certain to specify a background color,
>> since some people (like me) have a black background by default, and
>
> I have no idea what you are talking about. Â I sent "plain text", not a formatted or rich message in any manner whatsoever.
Outlook did it then, the source of your message contains a lot of this
kind of stuff:
"""
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:x=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p=3D"urn:schemas-m=
icrosoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office=
:access" xmlns:dt=3D"uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s=3D"=
uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs=3D"urn:schemas-microsof=
t-com:rowset" xmlns:z=3D"#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-co=
"""
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John Dlugosz
<JDlugosz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> your background is set to transparent, and you have black foreground
>> text, black text on black background makes for it all invisible. Â It
>> is best to send in pure text mode regardless,
>
> I always do. Â Outlook must have gotten confused when I pasted material in that was on the clipboard from the debugger. Â I'm sorry about that.
No problem, you might change your outlook rich-text message defaults
to include a background color then, just-in-case.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John Dlugosz
<JDlugosz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> That is because your boost is rather old, 1.38, the bootstrap and such
>> was added later on (1.40 I think?), you should update, and be sure to
>> rebuild with the proper define set as you did above.
>
> Since Boost is being used by other projects in the suite, I don't want to "change" anything or mess up their builds. Â I'm wondering how it manages to work for anyone, though, at this point.
No big point for that, just that is the reason that bootstrap does not
exist, it builds bjam and in the future may start to set some global
variable for the build process to simplify.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John Dlugosz
<JDlugosz_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> If it made no difference, it might be one of the other options that do
>> similar breakage like _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING. Â You can test it by
>> debugging into your project and seeing the generated assembly.
>
> Looking at my project, the #define's are:
>
> WIN32;_DEBUG;_CONSOLE;_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0;NO_DLL_INTERFACE
>
> that last one turns off the __declspec(import/export) attributes in some of the source files I'm compiling, and should not affect anything else. Â The others are normal Windows stuff.
>
>
>> Hmm, do you have a complete compilable example demonstrating this
>> problem? Â I will not be able to test it (for a week or so), but others
>> can.
>
>
> It's straight from the example.
>
> int main (int argc, char* argv[])
> Â {
> Â cout << "running." << endl;
> Â namespace po = boost::program_options;
> Â po::options_description desc("Allowed options");
> Â desc.add_options()
> Â Â Â Â Â Â ("help", "produce help message")
> Â Â Â Â Â Â ("COM", po::value<bool>(), "test COM implementation")
> Â Â Â Â Â Â ;
> Â po::variables_map vm;
> //////////// crashes in that constructor
The example tests build fine the build-bots for Visual Studio. Can
you attach *your* complete project with your build settings and such
and I can try it locally? My programming computer should be back up
soon. if you have VS2k5, try to send it as that as that is what I
have, along with your built executable and I can check its disassembly
directly.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net