Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move
From: Ravi (lists_ravi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-22 21:51:42

Next message: Kim Kuen Tang: "Re: [Boost-users] How to deduce (possibly void) return type of member function?"
Previous message: Terry Golubiewski: "Re: [Boost-users] How to deduce (possibly void) return type of member function?"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"
Next in thread: OvermindDL1: "Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"

On Friday 21 May 2010 01:32:02 Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> What if we use static_cast? Does this solve any problem? I don't know
> much about aliasing rules so can you shed some light on this?

The following is the (only?) best explanation of gcc aliasing rules that I
have seen:

http://cellperformance.beyond3d.com/articles/2006/06/understanding-strict-
aliasing.html

Regards,
Ravi

Next message: Kim Kuen Tang: "Re: [Boost-users] How to deduce (possibly void) return type of member function?"
Previous message: Terry Golubiewski: "Re: [Boost-users] How to deduce (possibly void) return type of member function?"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"
Next in thread: OvermindDL1: "Re: [Boost-users] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net