Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [chrono] v0.4.1 + thread_clock implementation on Windows

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [chrono] v0.4.1 + thread_clock implementation on Windows
From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-20 07:58:48

vicente.botet wrote:
> Joel, arithmetic and integral are not the same thing for me. I don't see how I can make ratio be a model of a MPL Integral constant as ratio is not integral, value_type can not be defined, there is no next, nor prior. Am I missing something?
>
>   
I'm fully aware of that, I was more suggesting that, yes, mpl::plus and 
etc works on ratio. Let's call that a Rational Constant then ;)
The alternative is to just rename ratio_plus to plus.