Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [chrono] v0.4.1 + thread_clock implementation on Windows

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [chrono] v0.4.1 + thread_clock implementation on Windows
From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-20 10:50:35

vicente.botet wrote:
> What should be for you the requirements for a Rational Constant?
>
> Expression Type Complexity 
> r::tag rational_c_tag Constant time. 
> r::value_type A boost::rational<integral_type> type Constant time. 
> r::num An integral constant expression Constant time. 
> r::den An integral constant expression Constant time. 
> r::type Rational Constant Constant time. 
> r::value_type const c = r()   Constant time. 
>
> Expression  Semantics
> r::tag  r's tag type; n::tag::value is n's conversion rank.
> r::num  The value of the numerator integral constant.
> r::den  The value of the denominator integral constant.
> r::type  is_equivalent<r::type,r>::value == true.
> r::value_type const c = r()  c.numerator() * r::den == c.denominator() * r::num.
>   
make sense I think
> Boost.Chrono follows the C++0x namming. What would be the advantage of renaming it?
>   
OK then