Re: [Boost-users] Why use 'functional composition' with boost::bind

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Why use 'functional composition' with boost::bind
From: Gaetano Mendola (mendola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-05 03:37:04

On 08/04/2010 09:22 PM, WB wrote:
> and I get
> Case 3 runs in ~1.8...1.9s, case 1 and 2 in 0.81...0.84s.
> This is the same ratio I already had (at least I'm not
> confused about that). So your 0.65s for case 3 is
> really amazing.

I'm getting:

Using a Xeon W5590 at 3.33GHz, with GCC 4.1.2

0 ->  0.08
1 ->  0.7
2 ->  0.7
3 ->  0.98

Using a Xeon X5650 at 2.67Ghz, with GCC 4.4.3

0 ->  0.09
1 ->  0.61
2 ->  0.61
3 ->  0.52

on same server using GCC 4.1.3

0 ->  0.09
1 ->  0.81
2 ->  0.81
3 ->  1.15

Regards
Gaetano Mendola