|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] How to disable warnings on gcc?
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-24 13:05:17
> On FreeBSD 8.1 with boost 1.43 and gcc 4.2.1 we have lots of warnings
> like:
>
> ...
> /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp: In instantiation of
> 'boost::detail::is_ununsigned_helper<short int>':
> /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:73: instantiated
> from 'boost::detail::is_unsigned_imp<short int>'
> /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:123: instantiated
> from 'boost::is_unsigned<short int>'
> /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/make_unsigned.hpp:110: instantiated
> from 'boost::detail::make_unsigned_imp<short int>'
> /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/make_unsigned.hpp:130: instantiated
> from 'boost::make_unsigned<short int>'
> /usr/local/include/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:846: instantiated from here
> /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:40: warning:
> comparison between 'enum boost::detail::is_unsigned_values<short
> int>::<anonymous>' and 'enum boost::detail::is_unsigned_values<short
> int>::<anonymous>'
I'm not able to reproduce that with cygwin-gcc-4.3.4
and -Wall -Wextra -pedantic and either Boost-1.44 or 1.43, do you have a
minimal test case?
It also looks to me that maybe BOOST_NO_INCLASS_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION is
defined given that the warning talks about enum's - however this should
never be the case with gcc.
Confused yours, John.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net