Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Fusion] fusion::for_each with stateful functors
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-20 14:00:57

Zitat von Paul Graphov <graphov_at_[hidden]>:

> Hello Boost Users,
> More than three years ago this question arose in this list:
> And as I understand it was concluded that overload for non-const references
> should be added.
> But now there are only const references to functor available. Was it
> forgotten or there are some
> reasons not to have such overload?
> What is the best way to solve the problem? Mutable members or some proxies
> look quirky.

without reading the thread, I doubt there is a consensus that
algorithm functors should be mutable.
you can create a functor that refers to mutable state, e.g. using Boost.Bind:

void f(int &state,T &e);

int main(){
   int state=0;

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at