|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [fusion] .at<N>() template member in containers?
From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-06 16:47:59
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 06 October 2010, Frank Mori Hess wrote:
> Wouldn't that require template specializations of the "at()" member
> template for its differing return types? IIRC, C++ doesn't let you
> specialize template members of template classes.
Err, nevermind. I just looked at how boost.tuple implements tuple::get.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkys4H8ACgkQ5vihyNWuA4Uw2gCgxt/8V1Ou6OC3VLBke0dqNyTZ
foMAoIVLI6dG0SZVy8injO+ZO72TO7Ay
=2ixb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net