Re: [Boost-users] [proto]: Adding functions to the lazy vector example

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [proto]: Adding functions to the lazy vector example
From: Noman (noman_bwp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-02 21:18:42

Eric Niebler <eric <at> boostpro.com> writes:

> Do you mean you want INC to *only* work on vector terminals, or should
> it work also on complex expressions? Should it evaluate eagerly or lazily?
> 

I want to move from the simple(only vector) to the complex version. It should
evaluate lazily.