Re: [Boost-users] circular_buffer, debug and invalid iterator checking

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] circular_buffer, debug and invalid iterator checking
From: Anthony Foglia (afoglia_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-09 10:39:06

On 11/8/2010 2:58 PM, Nigel Stewart wrote:
> Since the iterator is random access, perhaps they could be
> converted to integers via operator - and converted back to
> integers via operator + or operator +=.

That's what I did, but I used std::distance and std::advance instead, as 
per Meyer's suggestion in Effective STL.

-- 
Anthony Foglia
Princeton Consultants
[phone] x233