Re: [Boost-users] [PBGL] Betweenness centrality and named vertexes

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [PBGL] Betweenness centrality and named vertexes
From: Carmine Paolino (earcar_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-27 07:12:09

On 27 Nov 2010, at 12:48, Cedric Laczny wrote:

> Thank you very much for that information.

You're welcome. :)

> This is not intended to be picky. I simply want to clarify this for me. 
> Because AFAIK, using "external" classes or structs to represent properties of 
> vertices or edges is the concept of bundled properties (just as you do in the 
> examples). Using e.g. vertex_index_t or such (e.g. as defined in 
> properties.hpp) follows the concept of internal properties?!
> Nevertheless, I agree with you absolutely that using structs or classes to 
> represent the properties is far more flexible and increases the maintainability 
> of the code.

Oh, I'm so sorry… I mis[understood/named] bundled for internals, and structs for bundled…

My fault; we agree.