[Boost-users] Suggestion to the packaging of boost libraries

Subject: [Boost-users] Suggestion to the packaging of boost libraries
From: Taworn T. (taworn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-26 04:01:28

Boost is useful but quite large.  Is it a good idea to split the package, may be 

something like this:

The frequently used libraries, such as: smart_ptr, regex, and all other TR1 are 
packaged as "boost".

Other less frequently used, such as: wave, spirit, xpressive, etc.. are packaged 

as "boost++" or "boostx".

Sorry for my poor English.  I'm not a native English speaker. -_-

Regards,
Taworn T.